Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 03:03

What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Hey girls can we see some anal play?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Is there an MBTI personality that is more or less likely to handle stress?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
How can we understand the mind of a Trump supporter?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Texas governor vetoes hemp ban bill - Politico
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Men more likely than women to orgasm from anal penetration, study finds - PsyPost
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial day 27 recap: Judge signals plans to remove a juror - ABC News
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Can you explain the difference between a shower cap and a hair bonnet?